After describing a lot of promotional activities
such as (parades, readings, films), it reads like this.
The bicycle official Herr Blum is also aware of the dangers of an over-staging of cycling. If the infrastructure doesn't not grow along all the intellectual events, then Vienna's bike-friendly bubble risks bursting. "You need both. The people have to feel that cycling is taken seriously by the city's decision-makers. And it is this visibility that we are aiming for" explains Blum.
Newcycling had a lovely Vienna article this week too and Seville also a city of the same modal share of Vienna.Alec Hager explains how important this push is "We know that the majority of the strategic cycle routes, built in the 80s and 90s, are jammed up." For example Margaretenstraße: the narrow two-way cycle paths is one of the arterial routes into the city centre. Since 2002, cycling levels have doubled. We are striving for 10% bike modal share, and that means that the number of people cycling will double again. "This is why Vienna must develop bike-highways of four metres width - like they have in Copenhagen." continues Herr Hager.
That's Austria covered. As for Germans? They are scared.
Thanks for Cyclist in the City for uploading and Vole O'Speed (for the tweet). If anyone wanted a translation, let me know.
There are lots of really good soft measures in Vienna but the hardware is in need of attention. It is a lot better than British infrastructure but it is very confusing and frustrating to use. There is not yet the political courage to challenge the car for space and even when they have space the planners manage to make a mess and induce conflict wherever possible.
ReplyDeleteMore information (or at least my personal view) about the issues in Vienna is in my blog: http://crowize-vienna.blogspot.co.at/
Hi Doug - thanks for getting in touch! Makes a lot of sense what you say. (And yes, it can ALWAYS be better).
Delete