- car lane width - make as wide as possible to allow speedy traffic
- how many car lanes are required to squeeze through the desired traffic volume
- look at remaining space - give preferably to walking
- then to cycling (if anything is left at this stage)
So. Scrap the view-from-the-centre-line design approach. I propose we do it the other way round. Let's go outside-in.
- how much space is needed to walk safely here?
- how much space is needed to cycle safely here?
- what's left - design lane width and lane numbers and adjust speeds accordingly
Urban designers are required to transform our streets and roads. They have the vision. A lot has to do with perception change too. Local campaigns for better street environments and neighbourhoods have their role to play also, as have national road safety campaigns.
Designing outside-in means taking away from the car, and only giving to the driver what's left. Bare bone minimum. I think that's a fair approach. Yes, it will cause congestion. In the short term. It's not anything to be afraid of. The road space operates on a self-regulatory basis.
Build it and they'll come.
And yes, along fast busy heavily trafficked distributor roads I want cycle paths. I'd like to glide along (on one of the bikes below, choose a colour) in safety, gracefully, in peaceful harmony with my environment. If we got that sort of thing in Newcastle I do promise not to pull faces at the drivers! It'd pity them.
Very true. ...and of course the hidden variable is that the size (and number) of cars increases (particularly width, and influenced by passing fashions for off-road styled cars), so in effect motorists themselves continually reduce the 'value' of the road resource they have (and 'need' more). Ideally we would design for what we wanted in the future (i.e. a sustainable prosperous and healthy future). However we seem to be trapped between where the voters are perceived to be by politicians, the money made from cars (through parking and fines), and the general right wing aversion to anything 'planned'.
ReplyDelete